Skip to content
View commentaries on this research

Please note that this summary was posted more than 5 years ago. More recent research findings may have been published.

This is a plain English summary of an original research article. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and reviewer(s) at the time of publication.

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common and treatable but men are more reluctant than women to have a test. Self-testing is known to be accurate, but can men use this more?

Most men aged 18-35 would be willing to collect and send off a urine sample using a kit to test for STIs, according to a national survey. GP surgeries were the most popular place to collect kits, followed by pharmacies and sexual health clinics.

Other venues might be useful extra places to distribute testing kits and increase their use. About half of young men play football, and half of them are willing to collect kits from the club they play at. Extra advice from a health advisor or team captain does not seem to increase the use of these tests. However, none of the 90 men tested in this study had an infection, so football clubs may not be the best place to find men with undetected STIs.

Why was this study needed?

Chlamydia is the most common STI in England, with untreated chlamydia infection costing the NHS more than £100 million every year.

In 2015, over 1.5 million chlamydia tests were carried out. However, uptake of chlamydia testing is lower in men than in women, despite rates of infection being similar in both genders. Promoting testing in non-healthcare venues, such as sports clubs, and offering self-testing kits might improve rates in men.

In people who test positive for chlamydia, providing quick access to treatment and notifying their sexual partners can reduce the spread of infection. Genitourinary medicine clinics, which are where just under half of young people in England with chlamydia are diagnosed, offer tracing of sexual partners. However, 58.2% of cases are diagnosed outside these settings, where partner notification services may not be routinely available.

What did this study do?

This survey and the SPORTSMART pilot randomised controlled trials aimed to improve uptake of STI testing in men. They were part of a larger programme of research funded by NIHR.

The survey asked 411 men aged 18-35 years about their sexual activity and which venues they would collect STI tests from.

The pilot trial compared three ways of promoting STI opportunistic testing in six amateur football clubs in London. Two clubs received a promotional talk on STIs and self-testing kits during the pre- or post-match briefing. One club had the talk from a captain, and the other club from a healthcare professional. The third group had only posters, with kits available on request.

What did it find?

  • The survey found that the majority (85%) of men were willing to test themselves for STIs. General practices (80%), sexual health clinics (67%) and pharmacies (65%) were the most acceptable places for men to pick up a self-testing kit. Smaller proportions thought sporting venues, such as gyms (19%) and sports centres (13%), were acceptable pick-up points, although this rose to 54% among men who did sport regularly.
  • In the football club trial, about half of men accepted the offer of STI opportunistic screening: 50% of the football captain group, 67% of the healthcare professional group and 61% of poster only group, with no significant difference found.
  • Ninety men completed the tests altogether and none tested positive for STIs.

What does current guidance say on this issue?

NICE guidance on preventing sexually transmitted infections (2007) recommends holding one-to-one structured discussions with people at high risk of STIs. People with an STI should be helped to get their partners tested and treated, when necessary.

Public Health England advise that local sexual health services undertake opportunistic screening of young adults who are sexually active and without symptoms. They suggest this is done annually or on change of partner, in a variety of settings and that local authorities should work towards a rate of at least 2,300 chlamydia diagnoses per 100,000 population aged 15 to 24 years.

The British Association for Sexual Health and HIV statement on partner notification for sexually transmissible infections (2012) recommends that people with chlamydia should be offered at least one discussion (face-to-face or telephone) to begin the partner notification process. A plan should be agreed with the infected person about who to contact and how.

What are the implications?

These studies indicate that providing easy access to STI self-testing kits in various venues may increase uptake among men.

Previous studies have suggested that men may be open to collecting STI tests in non-healthcare settings, in particular sports venues. This study suggests that promoting STI testing in sports venues may increase their use, though few cases may be found.

Healthcare settings are still valued pick-up points and GP surgeries may be the most useful.

 

Citation and Funding

Estcourt C, Sutcliffe L, Mercer CH, et al. The Ballseye programme: a mixed-methods programme of research in traditional sexual health and alternative community settings to improve the sexual health of men in the UK. Programme Grants for Applied Research. 2016;(4)20.

This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research (project number RP-PG-0707-10208).

 

Bibliography

British Association for Sexual Health and HIV. Statement on partner notification for sexually transmissible infections. Macclesfield: British Association for Sexual Health and HIV; 2012.

NHS Choices. Chlamydia. London: Department of Health; 2015.

NHS Choices. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs). London: Department of Health; 2015.

NICE. Sexually transmitted infections and under-18 conceptions: prevention. PH3. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2007.

Produced by the University of Southampton and Bazian on behalf of NIHR through the NIHR Dissemination Centre

 


  • Share via:
  • Print article

 
Back to top