Skip to content
View commentaries on this research

Please note that this summary was posted more than 5 years ago. More recent research findings may have been published.

This is a plain English summary of an original research article. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and reviewer(s) at the time of publication.

Fewer deaths from stroke had occurred in people who had high blood pressure treated with amlodipine, a calcium-channel blocker, compared to atenolol, 10 years after the end of a large trial. People with high blood pressure who took statins were less likely to die from cardiovascular diseases, such as heart disease or stroke than those taking a placebo.

This study followed over 7,000 UK patients who had taken part in a clinical trial of blood pressure and cholesterol-lowering treatments between 1998 and 2005. It compared those who had been allocated to amlodipine with those who took atenolol. Those in either blood pressure group who had not already received a statin were also randomised to either atorvastatin (a cholesterol-lowering drug) or placebo.

Some caution is needed in interpreting these findings because no details were available on what treatments were taken after the trial ended. Both arms of the original trial were stopped early because of the superiority of amlodipine-based treatment over atenolol-based treatment and atorvastatin over placebo. But it is likely that all groups received similar post-trial management according to best practice at the time. The results add important information for clinicians and patients considering the long-term implications of taking these medications.

Why was this study needed?

High blood pressure affects around 12.5 million people in the UK. Treatment guidelines for lowering blood pressure and cholesterol are based on clinical trials where patients are followed for around five years. Longer follow-up is needed to understand whether the benefits of these medicines are sustained.

This study aimed to describe further outcomes 10 years after the trial had ended.

What did this study do?

The ASCOT Legacy study tracked the long-term health of 7,302 UK patients who had taken part in the original ASCOT trial which started in 1998. It analysed the cause of all deaths within the groups up until December 2015. The average age at entry to the trial was 64.1 years, 81% were men, and 24% were current smokers.

There were two arms to the original study, blood pressure and cholesterol lowering. Participants with high blood pressure were randomised to amlodipine, with perindopril added as required, or to atenolol, with thiazide diuretic added as required. After 5.5 years the trial was stopped because fewer people had died on the amlodipine-based treatment.

About 10,000 of the recruits, with a total cholesterol of 6.5mmol/L or less, were also randomised to either atorvastatin or placebo. This arm of the trial also was stopped early, after 3.3 years, because atorvastatin showed a clear benefit. Two-thirds of both groups then chose to be on atorvastatin for the next 2.2 years of the trial.

A strength of this study is its long follow-up. However, a limitation is the lack of information on the use of blood pressure and cholesterol lowering medicines after the trial finished, and the lack of recording of any harmful events, such as the side effects of treatment.

What did it find?

  • During almost 16 years of total follow-up, people treated with amlodipine were less likely to die from stroke than those treated with atenolol. In the amlodipine group 1.7% died compared with 2.3% on atenolol (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 0.97).
  • There was no difference in the number of deaths from all causes between the groups, with 38% dying in the amlodipine group and 38% dying in the atenolol group (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.04).
  • There was no difference in overall number of deaths from cardiovascular causes which occurred in 13.6% of the amlodipine group compared with 14.6% in the atenolol group (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.01). In the subgroup not on lipid-lowering therapy, there were fewer cardiovascular deaths in the amlodipine group, 13.7% versus 16.5% on atenolol (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.93) and fewer coronary heart disease deaths, 5% on amlodipine versus 6% on atenolol (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.99).
  • Fewer people died from cardiovascular-related causes in the group taking atorvastatin, 12% compared with 14% in the placebo group (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99).
  • There were no differences in numbers of deaths from any cause, deaths from coronary heart disease or stroke between the statin and placebo treatment groups.

What does current guidance say on this issue?

NICE hypertension guidance updated in 2016 recommends the use of a calcium-channel blocker (such as amlodipine) in people over 55 years or in black people of African or Caribbean family origin of any age with high blood pressure. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or low-cost angiotensin-II receptor blockers are recommended for people younger than 55. Beta-blockers (such as atenolol) are not a preferred initial therapy for hypertension but may be considered in younger people.

NICE guidance on cardiovascular disease risk assessment and reduction updated in 2016 recommends atorvastatin for primary prevention after optimal lifestyle management of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. Atorvastatin is then suggested for primary prevention for people who have a 10% or greater 10‑year risk of developing cardiovascular disease, estimated using the QRISK2 assessment tool. Atorvastatin is also the recommended treatment for secondary prevention after a patient has had a cardiovascular event.

What are the implications?

This study provides further evidence that blood-pressure and lipid-lowering treatment with a statin may have long-term benefits in terms of reducing cardiovascular outcomes. The choice of which regimen and sequence of drugs is best remains unclear.

All four groups are likely to have continued to require various blood pressure lowering medications after the trial finished and so it is not possible to confidently attribute the benefits to one drug alone. However, the current practice of controlling increased cardiovascular risk with blood pressure and statin treatments is confirmed by these observations over 16 years.

Citation and Funding

Gupta A, Mackay J, Whitehouse A et al. Long-term mortality after blood pressure-lowering and lipid-lowering treatment in patients with hypertension in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) Legacy study: 16-year follow-up results of a randomised factorial trial. Lancet. 2018;392:1127-37.

This study was funded by Pfizer.



Dahlof B, Sever PS, Poulter NR et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:895-906.

NICE. Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management. CG127. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2011.

NICE. Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification CG181. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014.

Produced by the University of Southampton and Bazian on behalf of NIHR through the NIHR Dissemination Centre


NIHR Evidence is covered by the creative commons, CC-BY licence. Written content and infographics may be freely reproduced provided that suitable acknowledgement is made. Note, this license excludes comments and images made by third parties, audiovisual content, and linked content on other websites.

  • Share via:
  • Print article
Back to top