Please note that this summary was posted more than 5 years ago. More recent research findings may have been published.
This is a plain English summary of an original research article. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and reviewer(s) at the time of publication.
A combination of aspirin, clopidogrel and dipyridamole does not reduce the incidence or severity of recurrent stroke in people who have had a stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA).
This NIHR-funded trial compared the triple treatment to current guideline-based antiplatelet therapy for preventing further stroke or TIA (brief loss of blood supply to the brain). UK guidance recommends aspirin initially followed by clopidogrel alone as for most people this gives the best balance of effectiveness and bleeding risk. Dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel may be used for the first three months following ischaemic stroke or TIA in certain groups.
The trial of 3,096 adults, mainly in the UK, shows that combining all three drugs does not add benefits. Although the risk of bleeding is low with both treatments it is greater with triple therapy. This suggests that triple antiplatelet therapy should not be used in routine clinical practice.
Why was this study needed?
Stroke costs the NHS in England approximately £2.8 billion per year. About 110,000 people in England have a first or recurrent stroke each year. Another 20,000 people have a TIA. The risk of having a second or recurrent stroke is highest immediately after a stroke or TIA, so guidelines recommend starting antiplatelet drugs within 48 hours.
Antiplatelet treatment reduces the formation of blood clots, and so lowers the chance of a further stroke in people whose stroke was caused by blood clots (ischaemic stroke). Recent research has shown that combining two different antiplatelet drugs may be more effective than treating with just one. This study aimed to discover whether combining three drugs would be even more effective at reducing the risk of recurrent stroke.
What did this study do?
TARDIS was a randomised controlled trial carried out in 106 hospitals across the UK, Denmark, Georgia and New Zealand. It recruited 3,096 adults admitted to hospital with a TIA or ischaemic stroke not due to a clot coming from the heart who were and at risk of a recurrent ischaemic stroke.
Participants were randomly assigned within 48 hours of symptom onset. The triple therapy group received aspirin (50-150mg daily), clopidogrel (75mg daily) and dipyridamole (300-400mg daily) for 30 days. The control group received similar doses of either combined aspirin and dipyridamole, or clopidogrel alone. After 30 days both groups were given therapy according to guideline recommendations. Follow-up was for 90 days.
As the trial was open-label, patients and clinicians were aware of which treatment they received, but most outcomes were objective, so the bias is unlikely to have affected the results.
What did it find?
- Overall occurrence of serious adverse events was similar in each group, 22% in the triple therapy group compared with 21% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.02 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86 to 1.22).
- There was no difference in the number of people with a recurrent stroke or TIA between the groups. Either occurred in 6% (93/1,540) of the triple therapy group, versus 7% (105/1,530) of the control group (adjusted common odds ratio [cOR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 1.20).
- Recurrent stroke occurred in 4% of each group, with similar ranges of severity.
- More severe types of bleeding were more than twice as common in the triple therapy group (adjusted cOR 2.54, 95% CI 2.05 to 3.16). Fatal or major bleeding occurred by day 90 in 3% (39/1,540) of the triple therapy group compared with 1% (17/1,540) of the control group.
- There was no difference between the groups at 90 days regarding disability, mood, cognition or quality of life.
- The trial was stopped early on the recommendation of the data monitoring committee.
What does current guidance say on this issue?
The Royal College of Physicians’ 2016 national stroke guideline recommends clopidogrel alone to prevent recurrence for people who have had an ischaemic stroke or TIA. If this cannot be taken or tolerated, they recommend modified-release dipyridamole in combination with aspirin.
For people who also have other conditions such as a stent in the heart vessels or severe narrowing of the vessels in the brain, they recommend clopidogrel plus aspirin. They do not recommend all three drugs to be taken at the same time.
What are the implications?
Triple antiplatelet therapy can’t be recommended in usual clinical practice to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke after stroke or TIA. The three drugs in combination did not reduce the incidence and severity of recurrent stroke or TIA but did increase the risk of major bleeding.
This trial was carried out predominantly in the UK (2,995 of the participants), with wide inclusion criteria, so is likely to apply to the UK population.
Citation and Funding
Bath PM, Woodhouse LJ, Appleton JP, et al; TARDIS Investigators. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, and dipyridamole versus clopidogrel alone or aspirin and dipyridamole in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia (TARDIS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial. Lancet. 2017;391:850-59.
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (project number 10/104/24/) and the British Heart Foundation (grant PG/08/083/25779).
Bibliography
NHS website. Stroke. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2017.
NICE. Stroke Pathway. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2017.
NICE. Clopidogrel and modified-release dipyridamole for the prevention of occlusive vascular events. TA210. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2010.
RCP. National clinical guideline for stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2016.
Produced by the University of Southampton and Bazian on behalf of NIHR through the NIHR Dissemination Centre
NIHR Evidence is covered by the creative commons, CC-BY licence. Written content and infographics may be freely reproduced provided that suitable acknowledgement is made. Note, this licence excludes comments and images made by third parties, audiovisual content, and linked content on other websites.
