Skip to content
View commentaries on this research

This is a plain English summary of an original research article

Extending the M74 motorway above Glasgow’s existing road network in 2011 has not affected the number or severity of road traffic accidents in the area. While the number of accidents fell by around 50% between 1997 and 2014, similar reductions were seen across other areas not affected by the motorway, suggesting a general trend of improved road safety.

Accidents are common on the UK’s roads. Interventions to reduce the number of accidents usually focus on education (e.g. drink-driving awareness campaigns), legal measures (e.g. speed limits) or infrastructure (e.g. traffic calming measures like speed bumps). This study investigated the impact of an infrastructure change.

Reducing the number of traffic accidents was one of the main benefits predicted for the new road, which did not happen in this case. This suggests that it should not be taken for granted that future motorway construction will reduce accidents.

Why was this study needed?

In the UK five people a day are killed in road traffic accidents, with a further 60 seriously injured. Nearly 75% of accidents in the UK occur where the speed limit is 40 miles per hour or less. Motorway travel is safer and only 5.4% of fatalities from accidents occur there despite them carrying 21% of traffic.

In Glasgow a 5 mile extension of the M74 motorway was constructed above existing roads to connect the M74 to the M8. Its aim was to improve travel between the East and West of Scotland and reduce traffic on Glasgow’s non-motorway roads. Its construction was controversial, but one of the major benefits predicted was that by taking traffic away from smaller roads it might reduce the number of accidents locally.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of this new motorway on the number, severity and types of road users involved in accidents.

What did this study do?

This study used data from a UK national database of road traffic accidents that have been reported to the police and resulted in a casualty. It focused on three areas in Glasgow – the area immediately around the motorway extension, the area surrounding another existing motorway, and an area without a motorway. Data for the whole of Glasgow was also used to establish broader accident trends.

The study looked at the number and severity of accidents at specific points – an approach called an “interrupted time series analysis” – between 1997 and 2014: prior to construction in 2008, during construction 2008-2011 and after opening in 2011. Data on the amount of traffic on the different roads included in the study was not reliable, so the analysis could not be adjusted to account for how busy the roads were.

What did it find?

  • The overall number of road traffic accidents between 1997 and 2014 fell by 50.7% in the area around the motorway extension (from 758 to 374), 49.3% in the area around the existing motorway (from 292 to 148) and 50.5% in the area without a motorway (from 315 to 156).
  • There was no effect on the number of accidents during the construction or after the opening of the motorway extension.
  • There were significant reductions in the number of serious and fatal accidents across all road user types. The area around the motorway extension had a lower reduction in pedestrian casualties of 52%, compared with 65 to 69% in the other areas studied.

What does current guidance say on this issue?

NICE produced guidelines in 2010 on preventing road traffic accidents involving children under 15 years of age and guidelines for preventing unintentional injuries in under 15 year-olds. Both made varied recommendations include the introduction of 20 miles per hour limits and zones and the use of design measures to reduce speed or improve safety. No specific recommendations relate to motorways. NICE recommended that programmes should be evaluated using a range of outcome measures, including road injury data.

Transport Scotland has a Road Safety Framework strategic plan in place to reduce the number of people killed on its roads by 40% by 2020. Its plan includes various policies for reducing speed, focusing increasing safety for motorcyclists, pedestrians and cyclists, and targeting interventions at young drivers (aged 17 to 25) and older drivers. It addresses road design to reduce casualties, such as pavements and cycle lanes.

The Highway Code provides guidance for all road users on how to safely and legally use the roads.

What are the implications?

During the study period traffic accidents were reduced across all three areas in Glasgow, with no significant differences between the different areas covered. This suggests that the introduction of a new urban motorway did not have the expected effect of reducing accidents. The fall in the number of accidents across the city is impressive and parallels UK-wide trends. City-wide programmes and other educational and legal interventions seem likely to have impacted on the number of road accidents. This study is part of a wider evaluation programme examining the impact of the M74 motorway extension on local communities, such as impacts on mental health and use of public transport.

The study focused on accidents only. There are other public health considerations in road construction, such as air pollution and the impact on “active transport”, such as walking or cycling. These are worthy of investigation in their own right.


Citation and Funding

Olsen JR, Mitchell R, Mackay DF, Humphreys DK, Ogilvie D; M74 study team. Effects of new urban motorway infrastructure on road traffic accidents in the local area: a retrospective longitudinal study in Scotland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016. [Epub ahead of print].

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research programme (project number 11/3005/07).



Brake. Road safety facts. Huddersfield: Brake; updated 2016.

Department for Transport. The highway code. London: Department for Transport; 2016.

Lyons RA, Ward H, Brunt H, et al. Using multiple datasets to understand trends in serious road traffic casualties. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40(4):1406–10.

NICE. Unintentional injuries: prevention strategies for under 15s. PH29. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2010.

NICE. Unintentional injuries on the road: interventions for under 15s. PH31. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2010.

Transport Scotland. Road safety framework: mid-term review. Glasgow: Transport Scotland; 2016.

Transport Scotland. The road safety framework, targets and reducing road casualties. Glasgow: Transport Scotland; 2016.

Produced by the University of Southampton and Bazian on behalf of NIHR through the NIHR Dissemination Centre


  • Share via:
  • Print article
Back to top