Please note that this summary was posted more than 5 years ago. More recent research findings may have been published.
This is a plain English summary of an original research article. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and reviewer(s) at the time of publication.
For ischaemic stroke caused by a blood clot, early surgical clot removal alongside medical treatment improves functional outcomes at three months compared with medical treatment alone.
Urgent stroke treatment is known to improve outcomes. Endovascular thrombectomy is a relatively new technique to mechanically remove the clot, where this is possible. Uncertainty over the optimal timing of the procedure led to this review.
This analysis of 1,287 patients in five trials found that endovascular thrombectomy improves outcomes only if performed within seven hours of initial stroke symptoms. The earlier that the clot was removed the better; the minimum “time to treatment” in the trials was 3 hours. Functional benefits lasting longer than three months are not yet known.
Current UK guidelines support endovascular thrombectomy if performed within five hours of stroke onset, so this review adds strong evidence to support the approach.
Hospitals need to have the resources, training and expertise in place to deliver this intervention. The findings reinforce the need for rapid hospital transfer and diagnosis so that patients eligible for the procedure can be treated as soon as possible.
Why was this study needed?
Around 152,000 people in England have a stroke every year, and most of these (85%) are caused by a blood clot (ischaemic). Endovascular thrombectomy aims to remove the clot, restore blood flow to the blocked area (reperfusion) and limit the brain damage caused.
Five individual randomised controlled trials demonstrated that endovascular thrombectomy improves functional outcomes at three months. Until now, the trial results had not been pooled and the optimal timing of the procedure was unclear. Normally clot removal is recommended within six hours of initial stroke symptoms, but some international guidelines suggest it can still be undertaken up to eight or 12 hours.
The researchers of those five individual trials decided to pool their patient level data to determine the time-window in which endovascular thrombectomy gives most benefit, and see to what extent treatment delay is associated with poorer outcomes.
What did this study do?
This review pooled individual patient data from 1,287 adults with ischaemic stroke included in five existing randomised controlled trials with timed outcomes.
The trials compared endovascular thrombectomy plus standard medical therapy with medical therapy alone. Standard therapy included intravenous clot-busting drugs (thrombolysis) if indicated, though slightly fewer in the intervention arm received this (83% vs. 87% of controls).
The main outcome of interest was degree of disability at three months assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Scores range from 0 to 6 with lower scores indicating less disability. Other outcomes included functional independence (mRS score 0 to 2), death and bleeding in the brain.
All trials were assessed as low risk of bias, although patients were aware of treatment given, and four trials finished early due to positive results.
What did it find?
- Endovascular thrombectomy improved disability scores at three months compared with medical therapy alone. Groups were similar at baseline. The average mRS score at 90 days was 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7 to 3.1) compared to 3.6 (95% CI 3.5 to 3.8) with standard medical therapy.
- Average time from symptom onset to start of endovascular thrombectomy was four hours. The chance of improved disability scores compared with medical therapy declined with increasing time to treatment initiation. For example, treatment at three hours gave 2.79 improved odds (95% CI 1.96 to 3.98) while treatment at six hours gave 1.98 improved odds (95% CI 1.30 to 3.0). Thrombectomy no longer gave any statistically significant benefit if delayed to eight hours (odds ratio 1.57, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.88).
- Researchers calculated that endovascular thrombectomy conclusively improved outcomes compared with medical therapy only if started up to 7 hours and 18 minutes after symptom onset.
- The chance of functional independence (mRS score 2 or less) at three months similarly declined with increasing time from symptom onset to reperfusion. Rates of functional independence were 64.1% with thrombectomy at three hours compared to 46.1% with thrombectomy at 8 hours.
- Time from symptom onset to reperfusion did not affect rates of death or bleeding into the brain.
What does current guidance say on this issue?
NICE 2008 guidelines on management of stroke states that urgent treatment improves outcomes. NICE 2016 procedural guidance on mechanical removal of clots confirms that the procedure can be a safe and effective treatment option. For appropriate patients, it should be delivered by trained staff within a well organised stroke service.
The Royal College of Physician’s 2016 guidelines on management of stroke state how endovascular therapy has been a major area of development since 2012. If indicated by brain imaging, combined thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy is recommended if the procedure can begin within five hours of symptom onset. In very specific circumstances, depending on clot location and if imaging shows salvageable brain tissue, this may be performed up to 12 or 24 hours after onset.
What are the implications?
This pooled data highlights the need for urgent assessment, diagnosis and treatment within stroke care. Endovascular thrombectomy can improve functional outcomes, but only if initiated within seven hours of onset of stroke symptoms. The sooner the procedure can be started, the greater the benefit within this windows. Longer term benefits in function beyond three months are not yet known.
Endovascular thrombectomy needs to be delivered within a well-organised stroke service. For hospitals that have the ability to deliver this intervention there are resource implications. Hyper-acute stroke services will need round the clock intervention teams, and these plus the support staff will need training in the procedure. Hospitals may need to refine their policies around speed of care and develop performance indicators.
Citation and Funding
Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, et al; HERMES Collaborators. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(12):1279-88.
This project was funded by a grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary.
Bibliography
Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. Fifth edition. Royal College of Physicians; 2016.
NHS Choices. Stroke. London: Department of Health; 2014.
NICE. Mechanical clot retrieval for treating acute ischaemic stroke. IPG 548. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2016.
NICE. Stroke and transient ischaemic attack in over 16s: diagnosis and initial management. CG68. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2008. Updated version NG128; 2019.
White PM, Bhalla A, Dinsmore J, et al, on behalf of British Association of Stroke Physicians, British Society of Neuroradiologists, Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party, Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care Society of GB & Ireland, UK Neurointerventional Group. Standards for providing safe acute ischaemic stroke thrombectomy. BASP. 2015.
Produced by the University of Southampton and Bazian on behalf of NIHR through the NIHR Dissemination Centre
NIHR Evidence is covered by the creative commons, CC-BY licence. Written content and infographics may be freely reproduced provided that suitable acknowledgement is made. Note, this licence excludes comments and images made by third parties, audiovisual content, and linked content on other websites.
